2 ms·
230 is mostly fine. I would add a KYC type of clause to it though. Basically if you can identify the speaker of a piece of content, then they are responsible, o
by bryguy32403 5y ago
230 is mostly fine. I would add a KYC type of clause to it though. Basically if you can identify the speaker of a piece of content, then they are responsible, otherwise the online platform is responsible.
Along with that, the DSA would need to be tasked with creating a strong id system for for companies to integrate with to make it easy for a service platform to identify their users if they want to
High level, I think it makes sense that platforms either ensure they know who is using their services or they pre-screen what they publish.
- throwaway0a5e 5y ago>I would add a KYC type of clause to it though. Basically if you can identify the speaker of a piece of content, then they are responsible, otherwise the online platform is responsible. The last thing internet platforms need is more incentives to invade users' privacy.