4 ms·
Yes, that's exactly what it means. The author's argument is entirely predicated on a confidence interval that includes 0. Your $100 donation to The Humane Leag
by reureu 5y ago
Yes, that's exactly what it means. The author's argument is entirely predicated on a confidence interval that includes 0.
Your $100 donation to The Humane League could kill 600 animals or save 1300 animals, or anything in between. Personally, that's not a compelling argument to me.
- nohuck13 5y agoNo, assuming [-6,13] is a 95% confidence interval on a normal distribution with mean of 3.5 (substitute your own reasonable assumptions about distribution and sample size), it's plausibly something like 3x more likely that the effect is positive.