3 ms·

Pretty sure the clouds one is a straight rip from one of Inigo Quilez's shaders: https://www.shadertoy.com/view/XslGRr https://www.shadertoy.com/view/XslGRr (no

• vmception 5y ago
  They should have just stuck with Apache or GPL license, as now any derivative work nullifies that adamant license and requires no attribution ngmi
  • user-the-name 5y ago
    Apache or GPL do not allow you to ban selling or minting NFTs.
    • vmception 5y ago
      Well! I suppose we are at an impasse! Jokes aside, pretty much no client side javascript allows this restriction. Its a tale as old as view source. My mantra is “do things worth suing over”. Prideful restrictive in line comments don't pass that bar for me.
• OldTimeCoffee 5y ago
  It is based off it for sure, the credits are on the Github repository[0]. The CDN version has no comments, but the source JS file really should have the source in a comment. [0]: https://github.com/tengbao/vanta https://github.com/tengbao/vanta
• deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
• q3k 5y ago
  https://github.com/tengbao/vanta/blob/master/src/vanta.clouds.js https://github.com/tengbao/vanta/blob/master/src/vanta.cloud... Definitely getting some 'can I copy your homework' vibes. But then again, if you use the original shader to educate yourself on how to render volumetric clouds... this is the kind of code you'll end up writing afterwards. And pretty much everyone writing any shadercompo-style code ever ends up borrowing some techniques from iq :).
• dorkwood 5y ago
  The birds look like this three.js example, too. https://threejs.org/examples/?q=bird#webgl_gpgpu_birds https://threejs.org/examples/?q=bird#webgl_gpgpu_birds
• deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]