> suggesting that foundation status or lack thereof meant that the ban was a good thing. Obviously not, I was talking about the shit article and not the ban. T

> suggesting that foundation status or lack thereof meant that the ban was a good thing. Obviously not, I was talking about the shit article and not the ban. They speak of “the free press foundation” like as if it’s a real thing and not a substack page some guy renamed a week ago. > Your other posts suggest that you don't know why the account was banned, so why is that question relevant? That’s the reason Twitter gave to the account holder. Obviously this guy was botting his accounts in order to gain more visibility for his paid zerohedge clone they’re all promoting https://www.alphaletter.co/ https://www.alphaletter.co/ Check out the “uncensored” Gab posts, most of them are pushing his sketchy paid newsletters https://gab.com/NancyTracker https://gab.com/NancyTracker Some other twitter accounts belonging to the same guy that were simultaneously banned: https://twitter.com/redditinvestors https://twitter.com/redditinvestors https://twitter.com/readalphaletter/ https://twitter.com/readalphaletter/ https://twitter.com/HermanHughPP https://twitter.com/HermanHughPP Oh, and the thread from the guy himself where he discusses his business https://web.archive.org/web/20211230221325/https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1476667596409872393.html https://web.archive.org/web/20211230221325/https://threadrea... It’s all a part of his marketing play idiots are falling for > Every day I would tweet about how Twitter is going to ban me to exposing political corruption. My newsletter exploded.