3 ms·
Your characterization of the book does not square, even remotely, with Wikipedia's. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._O._Wilson#Sociobiology:_The_New_Synthesis,
by KennyBlanken 5y ago
Your characterization of the book does not square, even remotely, with Wikipedia's.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._O._Wilson#Sociobiology:_The_New_Synthesis,_1975 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._O._Wilson#Sociobiology:_The...
Or that of EO Wilson himself: "the hypothesis that human nature has a genetic foundation"
https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/98/12/06/specials/wilson-naturalist.html https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/98/12/06/s...
- popcube 5y agohe just say human are not differ to animals, but usually department of biology will not concern social biology of human