4 ms·

This is just going in circles and all over the place. You seem to be upset about Trump and very upset I called his opponents what they are -- warmonger scum. Ob

This is just going in circles and all over the place. You seem to be upset about Trump and very upset I called his opponents what they are -- warmonger scum. Obama too, and Biden historically although if he's been forced away from wars by Trump's withdrawal plans and anti war rhetoric I'll take that as a great win and proof you don't have to hold office to effect political change. And the no true libertarian fallacy is that you're saying people aren't libertarians based on your purity tests. You have failed to show why Thiel is not a libertarian: your examples (military and border control) are completely wrong. And again, I have no such belief. How do you equate data with me believing that ridiculous thing you wrote. Finally, you're playing semantics with the whole "voting is not supporting" thing. I know you have no argument without that, but voting is literally supporting. That said, even with your semantics, leftists certainly support Democrats. I haven't bothered to look up studies but everywhere I look I see it, on here, reddit, leftist politicians like Sanders, political donation data, and people I know. And you're just claiming without any data that leftists don't support democrats and libertarians don't support republicans. Both wrong.

skinnymuch 5y ago
I’ve stated already to you. Bernie is a social Democrat. My examples were socialists and communists. You switched to leftists. And again I already brought up this Bernie point before. You say semantics then you shoehorn in leftists when I have never brought leftists up. Just sub groups of leftists. I don’t care if voting is technically supporting. It is obvious I mean support more than vote. Like Thiel does. This is something that has been consistent on my end and other people who responded to you in this thread. You continue to restate something I then said fine to (military, border control). I said immigration and something else. You didn’t reply to that. You repeated something I did not argue against once you stated it. Why bring it up again? — How oh how am I “very upset” about what you said about his opponents? I said I did not disagree. How is saying that being very upset? At this point every single thing I wrote in this comment shows you have repeated things or said things that have already been addressed. Then you take someone saying they do not disagree with your assessment on trump’s “opponents” (How are Bill Clinton and George Bush his opponents? So this isn’t true you didn’t bring up his opponents) as being very upset with it. Yes I am upset with Trump. I am also upset with Clinton and George Bush. Obama too. Biden too. > Biden historically although if he's been forced away from wars by Trump's withdrawal plans and anti war rhetoric I'll take that as a great win Key word “if”. Everything on your end has been seemingly done in bad faith. I listed all of this throughout this comment. > And you're just claiming without any data that leftists don't support democrats This was never said. More bad faith. > And the no true libertarian fallacy is that you're saying people aren't libertarians based on your purity tests. Reply to what I said. Is North Korea’s workers Union Les by Kim Jung Un, socialist? Is rhe PRC Govt communist as they say they are? > going in circles Yes because you like in this past comment keep regressing. Bringing up things as if they haven’t been brought up. Changing my words multiple times. Wild conjecture like being very upset with Trump opponents being called out when you didn’t even bring up his opponents. Regardless an incredible statement for someone who dislikes every one you have brought up. Once of us is going in circles in bad faith. Which does not allow me to continue as nothing I say is actually properly responded to. There is no reason to continue this as it doesn’t appear you can overcome issues like in the last comment.

skinnymuch 5y ago

I’ve stated already to you. Bernie is a social Democrat. My examples were socialists and communists. You switched to leftists. And again I already brought up this Bernie point before. You say semantics then you shoehorn in leftists when I have never brought leftists up. Just sub groups of leftists. I don’t care if voting is technically supporting. It is obvious I mean support more than vote. Like Thiel does. This is something that has been consistent on my end and other people who responded to you in this thread. You continue to restate something I then said fine to (military, border control). I said immigration and something else. You didn’t reply to that. You repeated something I did not argue against once you stated it. Why bring it up again? — How oh how am I “very upset” about what you said about his opponents? I said I did not disagree. How is saying that being very upset? At this point every single thing I wrote in this comment shows you have repeated things or said things that have already been addressed. Then you take someone saying they do not disagree with your assessment on trump’s “opponents” (How are Bill Clinton and George Bush his opponents? So this isn’t true you didn’t bring up his opponents) as being very upset with it. Yes I am upset with Trump. I am also upset with Clinton and George Bush. Obama too. Biden too. > Biden historically although if he's been forced away from wars by Trump's withdrawal plans and anti war rhetoric I'll take that as a great win Key word “if”. Everything on your end has been seemingly done in bad faith. I listed all of this throughout this comment. > And you're just claiming without any data that leftists don't support democrats This was never said. More bad faith. > And the no true libertarian fallacy is that you're saying people aren't libertarians based on your purity tests. Reply to what I said. Is North Korea’s workers Union Les by Kim Jung Un, socialist? Is rhe PRC Govt communist as they say they are? > going in circles Yes because you like in this past comment keep regressing. Bringing up things as if they haven’t been brought up. Changing my words multiple times. Wild conjecture like being very upset with Trump opponents being called out when you didn’t even bring up his opponents. Regardless an incredible statement for someone who dislikes every one you have brought up. Once of us is going in circles in bad faith. Which does not allow me to continue as nothing I say is actually properly responded to. There is no reason to continue this as it doesn’t appear you can overcome issues like in the last comment.