4 ms·
But if you want to "nudge" an otherwise near miss asteroid you gotta wait till however long till it comes around, which can be 1000+ years? From https://www.br
by omegalulw 5y ago
But if you want to "nudge" an otherwise near miss asteroid you gotta wait till however long till it comes around, which can be 1000+ years?
From https://www.britannica.com/science/Earth-impact-hazard/Frequency-of-impacts https://www.britannica.com/science/Earth-impact-hazard/Frequ...:
> Because there are far fewer large NEOs and long-period comets in space than smaller ones, the chances of a collision decrease rapidly with increasing size. The impact-hazard community—primarily scientists with an interest in the issue—has defined a global catastrophe to be an impact that leads to the death of one-fourth or more of the world’s population. An impact by a 1-km- (0.6-mile-) diameter NEO, the smallest believed capable of causing such a catastrophe, is estimated to occur about once per 100,000 years on average, based on the assumed population in space of such objects. On the other hand, an impact by a 100-metre (328-foot) NEO, the smallest believed capable of causing regional devastation, is estimated to occur about once every 1,000 years on average.
- omegalulw 5y agoI guess that link will underestimate the number of near misses but looking at https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_asteroid_close_approaches_to_Earth https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_asteroid_close_appro... the number of 100m+ objects isn't that common?
- Kim_Bruning 5y agoWell, look at it this way: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKKg4lZ_o-Y https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKKg4lZ_o-Y [Asteroid Discovery - 1970-2015 - 8K resolution] Take your pick! And remember one doesn't need a tidy Hohman transfer. Rather the opposite in fact. The nastier the intersect angle the better. (Hopefully we don't end up on some watchlist :-P )