3 ms·
That's good advice when first starting your savings journey, but once you have a large amount of money invested (>12 months of expenses) you don't really need t
by PragmaticPulp 5y ago
That's good advice when first starting your savings journey, but once you have a large amount of money invested (>12 months of expenses) you don't really need to keep an "emergency fund" in cash to cover months of expenses.
It's 2022. It's trivially easy to convert investments into cash.
- shric 5y agoUnless I need to, I don't like converting investments into cash due to capital gains tax (it's quite high here in Australia while earning at the highest tax bracket), so I keep about 6 months in cash
- idontwantthis 5y agoThat's not covering unlikely, but devastating events very well. Also makes it harder to stay rational during a financial crash. I'll always keep significant cash accessible at an ATM for safety and sanity.
- Rebelgecko 5y agoI would imagine there's a pretty strong correlation between job loss and a crashing stock market. I wonder how the opportunity cost of keeping an e fund in accounts that won't lose principle compares to the downsides of potentially having to sell off stock after a crash. Of course that's assuming you're able to sell your stock and transfer the funds in a timely fashion. Maybe things have changed in 2022, but I know plenty of people (especially using Robinhood as their brokerage) who had liquidity issues when trying to sell shares in 2021.
- notch656a 5y agoThey said invested, not stock market. That means bonds, precious metals / commodity ETF, mutual funds / stock market, the whole shebang. If your emergency funds are 100% stock market instead of diversified investments you're doing it wrong. If you don't trust electronic systems to stay on-line in a crash then your hedge is probably not USD but other assets, like canned goods / water filter / ammo / hard assets in your personal custody.