4 ms·
While I get your point, I took the article to be more in the vein of saying that the downturn hit everyone, so your previous year's income was a horrible metric
by andrewclunn 5y ago
While I get your point, I took the article to be more in the vein of saying that the downturn hit everyone, so your previous year's income was a horrible metric for determining who should get stimulus. There are plenty of industries where there are boom and bust years. Paying for stimulus checks with debt, and then telling people, who may have also fallen on unexpected hard times due to covid, that they made too much (and also contributed more in taxes) the previous year to get help... I mean the author does have a case.
- WheelsAtLarge 5y agoYes, but these type of articles have been around even before Covid. Here's one from 2013 76% of Americans are living paycheck-to-paycheck https://money.cnn.com/2013/06/24/pf/emergency-savings/index.html https://money.cnn.com/2013/06/24/pf/emergency-savings/index.... And I'm sure you can find more even earlier than than that. I've found myself at the edge of my finances at some point but can the number be so large all the time in one of the riches country in the world?
- PragmaticPulp 5y agoThese articles get published because they get clicks, not because they're accurate. The actual survey this article was based on is available here: https://www.bankrate.com/banking/savings/financial-security-january-2021/ https://www.bankrate.com/banking/savings/financial-security-... Scroll down to the question they asked and the results and you'll see that it's nothing like what this headline suggests. If you answered "put it on a credit card and pay it off" or suggested that you would cut other expenses that month, you were counted as being unable to afford it. The majority of Americans are not on the brink of financial collapse, but headlines suggesting as much will never fall out of fashion.