3 ms·
How about using the Bing API? Isn't that more open? With caching, I think you might be able to reduce the load. Also, why is w3fools in the list? It's an awfu
by yanmaani 5y ago
How about using the Bing API? Isn't that more open?
With caching, I think you might be able to reduce the load.
Also, why is w3fools in the list? It's an awful site.
- rickdeveloper 5y agoYes! Maybe I'll build a premium customizable version out of it. Do you think that'd be useful? Bing charges around $5 per 1000 searches, so the premium version would be around the same (with caching covering hosting, maybe).
- yanmaani 5y agoI think I might be willing to pay some amount of money for it, but not very much. I think a lot of other people would be willing to pay decently. If you want to be cynical, just do Bing/DDG searches over Tor, and scrape that into the cache. This is $0/1000 searches, though it obviously violates some ToS somewhere. Unless they want to block Tor, you should be good.