3 ms·
These are two entirely different situations. Tiny houses will never be practical for most people as people generally need indoor space to live. It's not a repl
by jokethrowaway 5y ago
These are two entirely different situations.
Tiny houses will never be practical for most people as people generally need indoor space to live.
It's not a replacement for a house, it's something else, a luxury toy.
Also, I don't get how such a small house in the middle of nowhere can be that expensive. Someone is profiting big time and you can get one for cheaper.
Electrical cars are practical for most people. Who the hell routinely gets to the limit of a EV regularly? They're just too expensive for now and charging is not as widespread.
Once more affordable models come out and chargers get installed everywhere they'll become the new standard.
- closeparen 5y agoA hundred million people took road trips for the holidays last month. They’re not all getting rentals.
- Gibbon1 5y ago"Also, I don't get how such a small house in the middle of nowhere can be that expensive." My belief is that utilities are expensive. Water, power, sewage. What costs $$$ to remodel? Bathrooms and kitchens. Then framing and drywall are cheap. And square footage goes up with the square of the wall length. So the marginal cost of more square feet is low. My feeling is if you're going to do tiny living spaces you want multifamily. And the last thing you want is McMansions in ultra low density suburbs.