3 ms·
It's definitely not fast, but it's not quite as bad as you might think. While I was testing it, the whole pipeline, from pressing the "go" button to the page b
by FaceKicker 15y ago
It's definitely not fast, but it's not quite as bad as you might think. While I was testing it, the whole pipeline, from pressing the "go" button to the page being fully rendered could take as little as 15 seconds.
Granted I'm just releasing this now, so if it gets any users at all we'll see how my cheap VPS holds up...
- redthrowaway 15y ago>While I was testing it, the whole pipeline, from pressing the "go" button to the page being fully rendered could take as little as 15 seconds. How is that possible? I thought the whole point of SMS was that it resided in the wasted bytes towers use when they "ping" phones. The reason text messages aren't instant is that these pings aren't sent frequently. I could be way out to lunch on my understanding, but this seems to be a latency killer (not to mention the limitations of packet size).
- FaceKicker 15y agoThe responses aren't sent by SMS, but MMS. My understanding is that to download an MMS you essentially get a data connection with your provider that only lets you download MMSes.
- sirclueless 15y agoThis is exactly why you are gonna get shut down.
- jjoe 15y agoHello, Let me know if you need a hand with hosting (VPS, dedi, etc). Don't worry about cost (no strings attached). Feel free to drop me a line at joe@unixy.net Cheers P.S: We've recently deployed a several 24-core SAS nodes so there's plenty of capacity to spare.
- FaceKicker 15y agoWow, thanks, I really appreciate the offer. I'll definitely let you know if I need help.