> The name clearly indicates that the primary feature is that it is not signed, and the logical conclusion from that is that it is not negative. No, the logica

> The name clearly indicates that the primary feature is that it is not signed, and the logical conclusion from that is that it is not negative. No, the logical conclusion is that since it has no sign, you don't know whether it's positive or negative. Otherwise the name would be "positive" or "non-negative", not "unsigned". And this conclusion would also be correct.