4 ms·

>Adherents would have you believe that the current price, whatever it is at a given point, must mean some variant of “can all these people really be wrong? That

>Adherents would have you believe that the current price, whatever it is at a given point, must mean some variant of “can all these people really be wrong? That’s ridiculous”. It’s not a reasonable starting point for a discussion, and then it immediately breaks down again. But it is reasonable to dismiss the whole field because you think it's a scam? Please read what you write before you post, as this is meaningless and illogical.

headmelted 5y ago
This is simply saying “can all these people be wrong?” in other words. What I wrote is absolutely logical as best I can tell. I didn’t say it’s a scam (although that community is riddled with those too). I said it’s a collection of ponzi schemes (for which there is far more evidence to support than it being a financial revolution). Charles Ponzi genuinely believed he had revolutionised finance, too. All you’ve essentially said here is “Lots of people hyping on social media, therefore no scam, shut up fool”.
- headmelted 5y ago
  The Ponzi comment above was a poor attempt at humour. He was a con artist who knew he was a con artist. I do not believe the majority of people in the cryptocurrency space are attempting to harm anyone.
notpachet 5y ago
I see you making a fair number of these sorts of ad hominem attacks in response to good-faith posts. Please stop.
- jakupovic 5y ago
  Based on my reasoning it is illogical and meaningless. Pretty sure same logic as the poster. You on the other hand are not providing anything, but read of what I posted previously, please stop.
  - notpachet 5y ago
    If you find something illogical and meaningless, take the time to explain why.
    - jakupovic 5y ago
      Will try to explain my reasoning better. Please see my reply to one of the comments where we compare youtube and web3. tldr; youtube/Google can change content of a link that points to them at will, but in web3 you cannot.

headmelted 5y ago

This is simply saying “can all these people be wrong?” in other words. What I wrote is absolutely logical as best I can tell. I didn’t say it’s a scam (although that community is riddled with those too). I said it’s a collection of ponzi schemes (for which there is far more evidence to support than it being a financial revolution). Charles Ponzi genuinely believed he had revolutionised finance, too. All you’ve essentially said here is “Lots of people hyping on social media, therefore no scam, shut up fool”.

headmelted 5y ago
The Ponzi comment above was a poor attempt at humour. He was a con artist who knew he was a con artist. I do not believe the majority of people in the cryptocurrency space are attempting to harm anyone.

notpachet 5y ago

I see you making a fair number of these sorts of ad hominem attacks in response to good-faith posts. Please stop.

jakupovic 5y ago
Based on my reasoning it is illogical and meaningless. Pretty sure same logic as the poster. You on the other hand are not providing anything, but read of what I posted previously, please stop.
- notpachet 5y ago
  If you find something illogical and meaningless, take the time to explain why.
  - jakupovic 5y ago
    Will try to explain my reasoning better. Please see my reply to one of the comments where we compare youtube and web3. tldr; youtube/Google can change content of a link that points to them at will, but in web3 you cannot.