It's weird how the risk of another Fukushima was successfully downplayed so much. Obviously it's the sole world leader with a PhD in nuclear physics who is onl

It's weird how the risk of another Fukushima was successfully downplayed so much. Obviously it's the sole world leader with a PhD in nuclear physics who is only one miscalculated the costs and risks. /s Obviously the fact that 0 insurers would touch a nuclear plant without pushing liability for 99% of the cleanup costs onto the taxpayer doesnt mean it's not 100% safe. Right? If the US nuclear industry's aging plants really were getting safer like they claim wouldnt they be happy to prove it by raising their liability cap a little bit above 0.1% of the cost of fukushima?