4 ms·

Scott Aaronson's review of the same book is discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29764537 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29764537

• dredmorbius 5y ago
  This is a different review, for what it's worth, though of the same book. The review is the salient factor here, not the book.
  • greenyoda 5y ago
    Which is why I pointed out who the author was. Someone who is interested in the book may be interested in reading multiple reviewers' perspectives. I had no objection to the posting of another review.
    • dredmorbius 5y ago
      Fair enough. The submission had been marked as "Dupe" at the time. Comments communicate both with their parents / upstream and other readers ;-)