> It’s not ok to call gas “green”. Period. And as helpfully explained by the top post you are replying to nobody does that. It is labeled as a useful transiti

> It’s not ok to call gas “green”. Period. And as helpfully explained by the top post you are replying to nobody does that. It is labeled as a useful transitional tool towards green energy (when obeying lots of additional restrictions) and thus deemed eligible for subsidies/investment. The headline shortens "eligible for subsidies/investment aimed at promoting green energy, but only if meeting lots of other requirements and ..." to "green".