Is that irony? I think irony would be if he was at the FEC (or perhaps not given some decisions by them). This seems more like fraud runs in the family, which

Is that irony? I think irony would be if he was at the FEC (or perhaps not given some decisions by them). This seems more like fraud runs in the family, which doesn't seem that uncommon (although maybe that's a variation of survivor bias in reporting?) That said I wasn't aware of the ENRON link. It's so nice to see that the VPs from Enron were still able to afford Stanford, living costs while in a startup, etc. I'm sure that similar was true for regular people as well right? /s