4 ms·
Happily the most important group is turning away from nuclear. Its investors. We all know that if big investors and countries will turn away from certain tech t
by max002 5y ago
Happily the most important group is turning away from nuclear. Its investors. We all know that if big investors and countries will turn away from certain tech then it will simply and slowly (or hopefully as fast as possible) die. And more and more countries are shutting down plants instead of opening ones. They cost tons of money more than predicted and the benefit is negligable (see example of france). Thats according to newest research and statistics (see germany which went full ahead renewables, closing down atomic AND coal). Paying 750 billions, was supposed to cost 250 billions euro (atomic plant in france). Plus many many billions for fixing up and upkeep of existing ones. It just doesn't calculate. And unless we build a new one every week it won't help with green house effect. We all are aware that atomic plants dont get opened up with speed of mushrooms growing after rain. So no. Atomic is no lt future.
Nuclear-power-a-false-solution-to-climate-change-44206
https://www.sortirdunucleaire.org/Nuclear-power-a-false-solution-to-climate-change-44206 https://www.sortirdunucleaire.org/Nuclear-power-a-false-solu...
https://www.nirs.org/nuclear-doesnt-help-with-climate-or-play-well-with-renewables/ https://www.nirs.org/nuclear-doesnt-help-with-climate-or-pla...
- sofixa 5y ago> They cost tons of money more than predicted and the benefit is negligable (see example of france). Thats according to newest research and statistics (see germany which went full ahead renewables, closing down atomic AND coal). Germany has multiple times CO2 per MWh generated than France, is that only a negligible benefit? Not even talking about Germany coal mines still operational and being a significant part of energy generation, and Germany buying that "bad" French nuclear energy. Nuclear power is expensive and very long term, it should never rely on private investment, because only the public sector can be that long term. Until massive energy storage is solved and affordable, nuclear is by far the best option.