3 ms·
I guess I'm echoing others here, but fuzzing is magical. I've given introductions to fuzz-testing to more than a few developers, and found interesting bugs in
by stevekemp 5y ago
I guess I'm echoing others here, but fuzzing is magical. I've given introductions to fuzz-testing to more than a few developers, and found interesting bugs in my own code using them.
Until now I've used "go-fuzz", but I'm very much looking forward to having real integrated fuzzing in the standard compiler/toolchain. That has to make things easier to explain and add to more projects.
Even with "100% test coverage" finding bugs due to fuzzing shows how hard testing can be.