4 ms·
> Putting a window on screen required the equivalent of rendering with Vulkan today. I'm honestly doubting you've done either because these are not remotely co
by xyzzy_plugh 5y ago
> Putting a window on screen required the equivalent of rendering with Vulkan today.
I'm honestly doubting you've done either because these are not remotely comparable. A "hello world" win32 program that draws a 2D image is easily at least one or two orders of magnitude less code than the vulkan equivalent. I've sold win32/mfc software that was only a few hundred lines.