3 ms·
Particularly as there still seems to be quite a disagreement over the dangers of Caesium-137 across the pond. The English, American sources dominated, Wikiarti
by freeflight 5y ago
Particularly as there still seems to be quite a disagreement over the dangers of Caesium-137 across the pond.
The English, American sources dominated, Wikiarticle makes it sound mostly benign.
Yet European language articles, like French and German, will be quite a lot more skeptical.
This even goes up to an official levels where afaik the EU has associated more dangers and risks with lower Caesium-137 than their US counterparts, thus the "tolerated levels" of it also vary greatly between the two.
- Krasnol 5y agoThe EU just recently decided that nuclear energy is green because some of the influential countries failed to get into renewables and now need to greenwash their rotting nuclear fleet. I rather trust my local scientists who care about peoples health.
- godelski 5y agoYour local scientists often advocate for nuclear. So I'm a bit confused. Sure there's some that don't but there's no large group that has unanimous agreement on anything.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- Krasnol 5y agoSo now scientists become activists? It seems to me you've drifted off with your argumentation. I don't see a reason to continue this discussion at this point.
- godelski 5y agoI was responding to this >>> I rather trust my local scientists who care about peoples health. You said you trust the scientists and not the government regulations. I'm encouraging you to actually talk to these scientists because nuclear is very popular among scientists.