3 ms·
> You very much attacked the person Sorry? I did not attack anyone. I am defending a comment by somebody else in which you presume they are personally attackin
by hatware 5y ago
> You very much attacked the person
Sorry? I did not attack anyone. I am defending a comment by somebody else in which you presume they are personally attacking someone who has openly admitted they work for Microsoft.
You really are lost aren't you? Along with the irony of mentioning "high-quality" comments. Wow. What is the _level of quality_ when the commenter has lost track of the person with whom they are speaking...? In case you missed it, I'm talking about you.
I will re-iterate, because I'm patient. I am telling you that you were overzealous in moderating a harmless comment about Microsoft as a company. There is no personal attack in the comment, no matter how you choose to view it.
Feel free to understand the perspective of others before you blindly share more of yours. What a disgusting interpretation of "moderation." Censorship is a much better word to describe where you're headed.
- dang 5y agoYou're right, of course: the comment I described as containing a personal attack was by bakul (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29684540 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29684540), not by you. Sorry for mixing that up! I've added edits to the GP to clarify. The core moderation point there is unchanged.