5 ms·
I laugh also at the term "African-American". The biggest problem with that term is that Africa is a VERY LARGE continent, and has people of all different races,
by simonblack 5y ago
I laugh also at the term "African-American". The biggest problem with that term is that Africa is a VERY LARGE continent, and has people of all different races, colors and physical characteristics.
Ferinstance, the Berbers of Morocco in north Africa are pale-skinned and blue-eyed. If their children end up in the US, would they also be called African-American? Similarly from South Africa at the other end of the African continent, the Boers are descendants of Dutch farmers. They also are pale-skinned and blue-eyed. Are they not African-Americans when they migrate to the US?
If people are black-skinned, or white-skinned, or rust-skinned it's not a problem with Political Correctness to state that fact.
There is a perfectly good word for people with black skin that has been made a derogatory term. It's time that word was reinstated. It is 'negro' which very simply means 'black' in Spanish and Portuguese. It is no more and no less derogatory than the English word 'white' to indicate white-skinned people.
It's time we grew up.
- desktopninja 5y agoThe whole concept of race is a fallacy. An Idea from the enlightenment period that should never have taken a foot hold. Race is tribalism not biological. Its also a fantastical identity construct (aka political identity). The whole $ORIGIN American labeling enforces separation rather than inclusion. Politicians knew this from the get go. Politics needs theatre ... a "us vs them" plot. This is why this nonsensical labeling persists. So yeah. We should have grown up a long time ago.