3 ms·
"forced to overwork and underpay people in jobs which have suckers lining up to fill them" The first half of your sentence is incongruent with latter half. If
by pxmpxm 5y ago
"forced to overwork and underpay people in jobs which have suckers lining up to fill them"
The first half of your sentence is incongruent with latter half. If you have people lining up for the position, you are demonstrably not underpaying. What you wrote is merely an inversion of the "jobs that americans won't do" fallacy.
To bring it all the way around, it was only very recently that Spirit was underpaying people and could not get enough staff. Low and behold, Spirit doubles the comp and presumably attracts more people.
- Retric 5y agoI think you missed the first half of why I was saying. Job turnover is an objective measurement you can take. If people show up to work the job but then quickly quit that’s just a sign of information asymmetry. Which is one of the ways economic systems can get unbalanced. It’s no different than an investment bubble or other situation that takes more than Econ 101 levels of analysis to understand.