3 ms·
> There's one Chrome release, I think 65.x, which screws it up when used together with gzip and requires a page reload after authenticating Fortunately, that C
by zinekeller 5y ago
> There's one Chrome release, I think 65.x, which screws it up when used together with gzip and requires a page reload after authenticating
Fortunately, that Chrome version is dead in the water (unlike Chrome 49, which is the last version for XP and Vista)
- diarrhea 5y ago> unlike Chrome 49, which is the last version for XP and Vista Oh God.
- mooreds 5y agoAgreed. My sympathies that the GP even needs to know this.
- zinekeller 5y agoNo need, I just angrily redirect users to FF52 (Firefox tends to be the last major browser maintained for older systems anyways). Plus, requiring a minimum of TLS 1.2 with specific PFS ciphers is now the requirement, nuking even the Windows Embedded POS version of Windows XP for Chrome (Firefox brings its own cryptographic libraries).
- forgotmypw17 5y agoThanks for the tip about Chrome 49. I'll add it to my list of browsers to test with more frequently. 65.x happens to be the last version added to Ubuntu 13.x, which is what one of my devices came installed with and I'm not motivated to change.
- yjftsjthsd-h 5y agoWhy would you stick with Ubuntu 13.x? It's not even a LTS version
- forgotmypw17 5y agoIt's what came with the machine and works fine for my purposes.