3 ms·
You started with an ad-hominem attack. And you just made a new claim with 0 backing in numbers. I don't know if you are arguing in good faith here, but defini
by lostmsu 5y ago
You started with an ad-hominem attack.
And you just made a new claim with 0 backing in numbers.
I don't know if you are arguing in good faith here, but definitely in low quality. Show us the numbers supporting your point. You just implied R is not affected by vaccination status, but you have provided 1 data to back this.
Whereas I provided a cumulative of thousands of cases, that directly support my point.
- ekianjo 5y ago> You started with an ad-hominem attack. Where? > And you just made a new claim with 0 backing in numbers. which claim?
- lostmsu 5y ago> Where? "vaccinated people not understanding the science" > which claim? "the fact that countries with high vaccination rates should effectively have a R trending towards zero if the vaccines even worked half as well as they should" (implying they do not have R trending to 0 vs unvaxxed).