4 ms·
I think it’s still related! Here’s a good video on the subject: https://youtu.be/d8RRE2rDw4k https://youtu.be/d8RRE2rDw4k Amsterdam is similarly regarded as ex
by noahtallen 5y ago
I think it’s still related! Here’s a good video on the subject: https://youtu.be/d8RRE2rDw4k https://youtu.be/d8RRE2rDw4k
Amsterdam is similarly regarded as excellent for biking and walking, but it’s also great for driving. This is hugely different from America, where basically every transit mode sucks (in dense areas) because dense areas are designed for cars at the local level. The solution that Amsterdam (and seemingly Tokyo) have used is to separate the two. You have roads which are excellent for high-speed cars, and local streets which are excellent for people to walk and bike. But you shouldn’t mix the two with local streets designed for high speed driving. (These are sometimes called “stroads”, and are one of the most common road designs used in North America for local access to shops.)
The reality is that if you follow the advice of walking/biking infrastructure advocates, you also get a city which is nicer and safer for driving, because cars are much more separated from the most dangerous and stressful elements of city driving!