3 ms·
WG 14 is C, WG 21 is C++. You are probably aware of the pace of evolution in the C language. Nothing happens, and if it's a horror show. The maximally take th
by rurban 5y ago
WG 14 is C, WG 21 is C++.
You are probably aware of the pace of evolution in the C language. Nothing happens, and if it's a horror show. The maximally take the easiest thing from C++, but usually the worst.
- flohofwoe 5y agoOn the other hand, the advantage of the glacial pace of change in the C standard is that the language hasn't been ruined yet. One of the most important tasks of the committee should be to say "no", even if that's not a popular thing to do. The right place for experiments in the C ecosystem is outside the standard, in libraries and language extensions.
- ncmncm 5y agoC started out ruined. But ate the world anyway. The C++ committee says "no" overwhelmingly more often than not. That is much of what Izzy was complaining of. Izzy got more stuff into C++ than 99.99% of others who tried. Ze spread zerself too thin pushing too many things. It is a major achievement to get one thing in.
- rurban 5y agoThey should have said no to Unicode identifiers with C11. They have now a big security mess. They should have adopted u8 instead if wchar.