4 ms·
Within my family, they weigh the risks of what they believe the side-effects are and the disease. They all live in very remote areas with few people so the ris
by bmeski 5y ago
Within my family, they weigh the risks of what they believe the side-effects are and the disease.
They all live in very remote areas with few people so the risk is low to begin with. They aren't entirely "unintelligent", and I respect their decisions.
- leeoniya 5y agothe problem is 1. infectious disease that can kill others. it's great that they are remote, but they still interact with others sometimes. no one requires them to wear warning signs. as numerous others have pointed out, it's like drunk driving. drinking while driving is not just personal choice, even if it seems like just you minding your own alcohol. 1a. even if the disease itself is not sufficient to kill people but causes them to seek medical attention, beyond the capacity of the healthcare system, this means worse outcomes for those who could not have avoided ending up in the hospital. 2. ask what doctors think about treating them when they get polio or things we havent seen in many generations. even intelligent people are terrible at assessing risk in areas where they are not professionals. see how many doctors are antivaxxers, how many security professionals click on https://chase.myaccount.com https://chase.myaccount.com links, etc.