4 ms·
Vaccines reduce spread because of lower viral load. Also reduces severity. Antivaxxers can be execrated for all I care - dumbest way to enforce your freedom
by darknessmonk 5y ago
Vaccines reduce spread because of lower viral load. Also reduces severity.
Antivaxxers can be execrated for all I care - dumbest way to enforce your freedom
- cft 5y agoI was sick with 101.5F for a week, excruciating headaches, confirmed by a positive PCR after Moderna vaccination. My girlfriend as well, two months after the second dose. How much higher would our viral load be without Moderna?
- scott_w 5y agoIt’s hard to say, maybe the vaccine didn’t work on you. Or maybe it saved yours and your girlfriend’s life. It’s hard to say on a case-by-case basis which is why we depend on population-level data.
- cft 5y agoMy girlfriend is 29. Maybe it saved her life, but the COVID mortality at that age is very very low.
- jquery 5y agoWhatever your experience with the virus was, it would’ve been a lot worse if you were unvaccinated.
- kbelder 5y agoProbably. Don't overstate your certainty. It's an error and moves you farther from the truth, not closer.
- xienze 5y ago> Vaccines reduce spread because of lower viral load. Also reduces severity. And yet, case counts have never been higher than now, a year into vaccines and infections. Ah, but Omicron you may say. Well doesn’t that imply that the vaccine isn’t terribly effective against that strain? Yet the answer seem to be “just keep getting more injections of the same vaccine formulation.” Perhaps one or more of our fundamental assumptions are wrong. Maybe the vaccines aren’t actually that effective (Israel is on dose number 4 within a calendar year…). Or maybe PCR tests cranked to an absurd number of cycles aren’t actually detecting what we think they are (an actual infection versus some dead cells in the nasal passage).
- SamoyedFurFluff 5y agoEven in omicron, vaccinated people are less likely to catch Covid than unvaccinated people. It can be simultaneously true that vaccinated people are less likely to have Covid and that Covid vases are rising due to a highly infectious variant.
- MiroF 5y ago> maybe PCR tests cranked to an absurd number of cycles c'mon, you're at least a year behind the conspiracy theory state of the art, we're on vaccine infertility now.
- mardifoufs 5y agoI guess you should email the NYT and ask them to stop peddling conspiracy theories: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testin...?
- MiroF 5y ago> Any test with a cycle threshold above 35 is too sensitive, agreed Juliet Morrison, a virologist at the University of California, Riverside. “I’m shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive,” she said. I'm a bit confused by this article. AFAIK PCR tests are only reporting a positive at 35 cycles. The author of the article is correct that it is run for 40 cycles often, but this is only because a positive between 36-40 cycles indicates "unclear result" and the test is repeated with a different assay targeting a different component of the virus. Positive is only reported at 35 cycles max. This should not pick up any "dead cells", it will pick up viral mRNA. There is a concern over picking up low loads, but the mRNA is still there.