2 ms·
Counterproposal: ditch at least the year. It’s obviously silly.
by chrismorgan 5y ago
Counterproposal: ditch at least the year. It’s obviously silly.
- JimDabell 5y agoIt needs the year to be legally valid. But removing it altogether is perfectly reasonable. Creative works are copyrighted by default, no notice necessary.
- chrismorgan 5y agoIf the year is nonsense, it won’t be legally valid. A statement identifying the copyright holder should surely carry just as much weight legally, and is certainly more useful. Certainly removing it outright is the sensible thing in most places, I was just suggesting a better middle ground for those that want to have something there.