3 ms·
>Pretty sure I was talking about smallpox, as a general example how mandatory vaccinations helped in the past. So how is it relevant to this conversation, whic
by trompetenaccoun 5y ago
>Pretty sure I was talking about smallpox, as a general example how mandatory vaccinations helped in the past.
So how is it relevant to this conversation, which isn't about smallpox and where mandatory vaccination won't help?
SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 are both SARS, it's not a coincidence they're named such. The media simply called the first one 'SARS' when there wasn't a second one yet. Then they labeled the new one "coronavirus". You can see even the people reporting on this are confused.
- usrbinbash 5y ago> So how is it relevant to this conversation It shows that mandatory vaccination works in fighting infectious diseases. Whether that results in the eradication of the disease, or getting it under control to a degree that we no longer have to have lockdowns, and/or masks in public transports, is irrelevant.