I'm glad no one was hurt. This time. Willful risk of life, to say nothing of the property damage and the trespass of piling burning refuse on your property (ov

I'm glad no one was hurt. This time. Willful risk of life, to say nothing of the property damage and the trespass of piling burning refuse on your property (over the property line)... I would be furious. I see a number of comments here that basically say, "No harm, no foul". I don't understand this attitude. There are a number of regulations that can establish the right of a property owner to be liable for risk of harm to another. One instance I can think of is a tree or structure is at legitimate, immediate risk of falling over onto your property. Wildfire ordinances in rural areas -- out here, you need a permit for a burn like that, which could be revoked after an incident like this. If you have cause to believe that you see an impaired driver, you don't have to wait for them to hit your car. Or run over your dog in the front yard. This is nuts.