> I don’t think we’re going to agree here, even though I’ve tried to find common ground a few times. You've repeatedly said that "check your privilege" is used

> I don’t think we’re going to agree here, even though I’ve tried to find common ground a few times. You've repeatedly said that "check your privilege" is used in ways that it isn't used and denied that it is used the way it is used. My "ground" is reality. > The good that comes from recognition is being able to place yourself in someone else’s shoes and empathize better with their lived experiences, thus enabling you to better understand their situation. That's all well and good. The reality is that it has nothing to do with how "check your privilege" actually works. I note that you didn't both to come up with anything other than your opinion to support your interpretation. Meanwhile, I've provided cites showing that you're wrong, by proponents of "check your privilege". There's also the Atlantic article. Can you point to ANYONE who interprets "check your privilege" the way that you do? (In fact, even you don't, as your refusal to use it with POC demonstrates.)