3 ms·
NAT not being designed for security does not negate the effect of security it does have. This goes to the 80/20 rule, IPv6 is a security nightmare if not deploy
by syshum 5y ago
NAT not being designed for security does not negate the effect of security it does have. This goes to the 80/20 rule, IPv6 is a security nightmare if not deployed correctly, and I am surprised more home users have not gotten hit with this security time bomb
- normaler 5y agoI feel that. I have a VPS that i run OpenBSD on. I messed up my config and now my phone was publicly reachable via its /72 ipv6 from the /64 adress i was assigned. Kinda scary/weird
- deadbunny 5y ago> Security nightmare How so? Allow established, then drop. You know. The same rules in ever consumer level router on the market now.
- Dagger2 5y ago> NAT not being designed for security does not negate the effect of security it does have. This is true... but the security impact of NAT is negative. It provides no security benefit, but it does confuse people about the security properties of their network, often providing a false sense of security.