6 ms·
I wish my fiber ISP was part of that 50%. But nope, here I am behind a CGNAT and was promised IPv6 adoption about a year ago. Unfortunately the only other optio
by pathartl 5y ago
I wish my fiber ISP was part of that 50%. But nope, here I am behind a CGNAT and was promised IPv6 adoption about a year ago. Unfortunately the only other options in my area (downtown Milwaukee) are some form of wireless, DSL, or Spectrum.
Don't get me wrong, even though my speeds are only about 50% of spec (gigabit symmetric), the upload speed alone is a reason to avoid any other provider. I'm also paying about $25/m less than the equivalent download on Spectrum.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- lnxg33k1 5y agoSo my italian ISP, gives me FTTH, 1gb/s down , 300mb/s up but has 10/10 for ipv6 https://i.imgur.com/lhz4RJy.png https://i.imgur.com/lhz4RJy.png I would rather have 700mb/s more for upload than ipv6 to be honest (only thing I also have public/static ipv4, so maybe that I wouldn't give up ^^)
- boardwaalk 5y agoYou get different speeds for IPv6…? Whatever’s going on internally there has to be a mess of old and new software and hardware.
- q3k 5y agoNah, just not bothering to set up IPv6 peering sessions.
- daxuak 5y agoSo does mine. The only v6 option is comcast and I'm not switching.