5 ms·
Many people have told him how websites work. He has decided that he does not care. This is what it means to be an ideologue. It's not about being one party or
by coffeefirst 5y ago
Many people have told him how websites work. He has decided that he does not care.
This is what it means to be an ideologue. It's not about being one party or another, it's that your own narrative supersedes reality to the point that you can't say "in general X is true, but in this case the shoe doesn't fit."
- RicoElectrico 5y agoJust like PiS in Poland, the spokesman Fogiel said: We don't employ experts, as the would not realize our program.
- jahnu 5y agoSounds like the UK politian Michael Gove on the run up the to Brexit vote, "I think the people of this country have had enough of experts..."
- Smaug123 5y agoI will never not correct this quote: > “I think the people in this country have had enough of experts... from organisations with acronyms saying that they know what is best and getting it consistently wrong." (My ellipsis here is to remove a bit where he got a few words in a nonsensical order, and reordered them, rather than to remove the context of the quote.)
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- redis_mlc 5y ago
- jahnu 5y agoI don't really feel this is correcting anything. There is nothing misleading about it since it's still the same point! Gove adding on some vague qualification at the end does not change the intention. Experts almost invariably fit that qualification so it's superfluous and handwavy. If he had mentioned some specifics then it would have a different intention and I and others would leave that extraneous rambling nonsense on the quote. Indeed it's an even more shameful quote with that bit.
- Smaug123 5y agoI think your point assumes that all experts are always wrong, which is a point on which we disagree. Many people call themselves experts and are often wrong - though I would call such people "pundits" rather than "experts" - and it's those people we've had enough of.
- pyuser583 5y agoFrom what I’ve heard, the “hack” involved decoding base64 text, which can look like decrypting cipher text. The fact that cipher text often is base64 makes that all the more confusing. I hope this gets sorted out, or the trial shows something substantial that hasn’t been shared so far.