>_I_ see a leaf in the foreground, You keep repeating "I". Again, the emphasis on "I" in your sentence is not relevant to the commenter right above you percei

>_I_ see a leaf in the foreground, You keep repeating "I". Again, the emphasis on "I" in your sentence is not relevant to the commenter right above you perceiving something else: "The blurry plus the tiny twigs connected to those leaves still make my brain think it's some GAN artifacts." The blue/white dress example was not to apply color to the iPhone example but a cultural reference to this perception debate: https://www.google.com/search?q=was+dress+blue+or+white https://www.google.com/search?q=was+dress+blue+or+white Or put another way, consider : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_mind https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_mind EDIT reply to: >This is honestly blowing my mind that you think theory of mind applies Let me try to put it this way... nawgz sees a clear and realistic leaf in the foreground. Case closed. Therefore, nawgz would not even submit a Twitter post or a new thread to HN wonder why the head is missing. And yet, such a thread exists with (some) commenters wondering if the software had a glitch: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29739235 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29739235 Stepping outside of yourself and considering Theory Of Mind might help explain to you why such a thread exists with comments even though you yourself see no issue with the photo. EDIT2: >There is no room for human perception here. There is room for human perception because the person who took the original iPhone photo and posted it on Twitter is a senior iOS programmer with a degree in computer science and yet he overlooked the possibility of a real leaf. If we take his story at face value, his particular mind and perception initially chose to believe that iOS photo software replaced the head with a leaf rather than consider a scenario that a tree branch in front of his own house occluded the walker's head. Only when another programmer on Twitter theorized that a real leaf is in the foreground, he then went back outside again to notice that there's a low hanging branch on his tree. (That's his later video showing parallax demonstration.) The original photographer did not believe the pixels in his own photo. That's a human perception issue. That faulty perception led to software theories from some programmers in that Twitter thread including this comment: >When you open iPhone camera, it keeps recording. When you take a shot, it takes some frames from before and after you pressed the shutter and then merges those to create a detailed photo. One of this frame had this leaf on her head. -- from https://twitter.com/masnun/status/1476457354128281600?s=20 https://twitter.com/masnun/status/1476457354128281600?s=20