3 ms·
I'm sure the FBI would go into hysterics if there was a publicly accessible facial recognition database of all FBI employees and all FBI informants - but is the
by photochemsyn 5y ago
I'm sure the FBI would go into hysterics if there was a publicly accessible facial recognition database of all FBI employees and all FBI informants - but is there really a problem with that? Why should secretive police organiziations - which have a notorious history related to the establishment of totalitarian states - be subject to different rules about data privacy then the general public is? Why shouldn't citizens have access to an app that allows them to easily identify undercover police seeking to infiltrate peaceful protest movements via facial recognition, for example?
The counterargument (authoritarian) is that police spies are necessary to combat various forms of crime in which all parties to the criminal activity have no interest in reporting said criminal activity - for example, illegal drug transactions. The counter-counterargument (libertarian) is that such forms of crime are actually victimless and the solution is to legalize and regulate all such drug transactions, to move them into the same sphere as alcohol sales.
It would be a very curious world, however, in which anyone could point their phone at anyone else and get an immediate background report on them (which is apparently what the government agencies like the FBI want to be able to do), including their home address, phone number, credit history, educational background, criminal records if any, online browsing habits, family and business relationships, medical history, travel patterns... that would be a very creepy world indeed. It already seems to exist for the secret police, however, with tools like Palantir coupled to this facial recognition system. The potential for gross abuse is pretty obvious.
Government regulation banning all such facial recognition software and data collection and aggregation is the only realistic option if we want to prevent such a dystopian future. People should have a right to privacy, even if this destroys the business model of Google, Facebook, and other personal data-based targeted advertising platforms, and so what if it makes the job of law enforcement harder? Read the Bill of Rights, about half of it is all about making it harder for law enforcement to snoop on citizens.
- whodunnit 5y agoInformation ownership and a digital bill of rights would solve this. It should be considered a basic human right to own one’s information just as one owns one’s body.
- novok 5y agoYup, police always want the power relationship to be one way. You see it today with special public records exceptions, special license plates and more, which are not available for many others who would benefit, like DV victims, psychologists, and more.