3 ms·
UTF-32 was an interesting choice. Was that done for the sake of completeness or was there a specific use case for it?
by ChrisSD 5y ago
UTF-32 was an interesting choice. Was that done for the sake of completeness or was there a specific use case for it?
- WalterBright 5y agoIt was done for completeness. I was accused of being an anglophile at one point for not doing everything in UTF-32 :-)