3 ms·
Then it's truly an aberration and not nearly the slam dunk you think it is. Because it was so odd, they specifically looked into it.
by bena 5y ago
Then it's truly an aberration and not nearly the slam dunk you think it is. Because it was so odd, they specifically looked into it.
- jtc331 5y agoIt doesn’t need to be a “slam dunk”. It accomplished what I intended, which is show that you were making claims that were verifiably false.