Visiting a publicly available web page doesn’t create contractual obligation between end users and web server owners. If Google views what telegram doing as ab

Visiting a publicly available web page doesn’t create contractual obligation between end users and web server owners. If Google views what telegram doing as abuse, then how it’s different from what end users are doing while interacting with https://translate.google.com/ https://translate.google.com/ web page? Especially if these end users are running an ad blocker or two in their web browser? BTW, uBlock origin blocked 4 pieces of content on that web page.