3 ms·
I'm definitely not someone who reads these types of articles often but this part definitely stood out to me. Are these analogies common? It seemed odd.
by blackearl 5y ago
I'm definitely not someone who reads these types of articles often but this part definitely stood out to me. Are these analogies common? It seemed odd.
- PopeUrbanX 5y agoNo, these are clearly very marginal academics ("independent consultants", seriously?) doing bad science.
- PragmaticPulp 5y agoNo, this article has a number of dog whistles and other verbiage that is meant to appeal to anti-vaxers and conspiracy theorists. It’s not good scientific work. It’s an agenda-pushing piece disguised as a journal article.