I appreciate the openness on their part. I can relate to the difficulty of crafting anti-spam risk assessment rules. It’s common to take these factors into acco

I appreciate the openness on their part. I can relate to the difficulty of crafting anti-spam risk assessment rules. It’s common to take these factors into account, and it would explain why .xyz is blocked; that’s on a lot of naughty lists because of early registry rules that were inadvertently amenable to malicious actors. That being said, they’ve clearly got some serious false positives, so their rules need work.