3 ms·
It's not clear what you're disputing. Criminal trials are generally biased towards the defense. If it's unclear if the evidence is doctored or not it shouldn't
by xdennis 5y ago
It's not clear what you're disputing.
Criminal trials are generally biased towards the defense. If it's unclear if the evidence is doctored or not it shouldn't be introduced to potentially mislead the jury.
- dagmx 5y agoI'm disputing people using this case of the iPhone CAPTURE process screwing up as vindication for the judges distrust of the PLAYBACK process. A) video scaling is a well documented and well understood field. The judge's mistrust was wrong to begin with, and if he distrusted the scaling algorithm, then there's no reason to trust any capture process either. It's reductionist if they're not going to try and understand what's going on. B) if the judge mistrusted it, there should be a standard platform for playback that can be trusted by them otherwise it's an easy out for dismissing any evidence C) again, people are conflating capture and playback. They're different, and issues in one don't translate directly to the other.