If you think about any of their suggestions for more than three seconds, it becomes clear they’re not feasible. For example: > The idea behind this concept is

If you think about any of their suggestions for more than three seconds, it becomes clear they’re not feasible. For example: > The idea behind this concept is for the “cabin” part of the vehicle to constantly suit your personal requirements. In the future, you’ll be able to ask for a certain interior and exterior combination via an app probably and as the car comes to where you’re at, you get to discover, not only the perfect cabin for you but also some with different designs and purposes. This would instantly double the amount of trips necessary for any rideshares where you need (want) to customize the cabin (Current Location -> Closest Cabin Station -> Your location, as opposed to Current Location -> Your location). Since folks customizing the cabin likely won’t want to pay double the price, that additional cost will be distributed in part to every consumer. For such a price sensitive market, I don’t see this being even close to feasible. That said, maybe the article was satirical like another commenter mentioned, and this was a comment made in jest that went entirely over my head.