3 ms·

Maybe if people focused on their own privileges instead of coming up with an ever-more-adjectived punching bag for all of society’s ills it would go over better

Maybe if people focused on their own privileges instead of coming up with an ever-more-adjectived punching bag for all of society’s ills it would go over better.

acdha 5y ago
Isn’t that what we’re seeing? Nobody is saying it’s bad to be a straight white male, only that people like us are playing on easy mode. The goal is for everyone to be able to enjoy that.
- AQuantized 5y ago
  There are plenty of people in those 'privileged' categories who are not playing on easy mode. A given person fitting that description isn't necessarily represented by the average
  - SamoyedFurFluff 5y ago
    It’s okay for privilege to be intersectional. A straight white cis male can still suffer from ableism and classism. But it’s also okay to acknowledge that even in circumstances like being disabled, being perceived as a white cis straight male will have benefits compared to a black trans woman in the same situation, even if that situation sucks for both parties.
    - vanusa 5y ago
      It's also okay to not assume that certain categories of people are sheltered and naive, based solely on their gender status and inferred ancestral composition. And in need of a public calling-out and talking-to, based solely on those observed properties. Which is what started this whole sub-thread, after all.
- bradleyjg 5y ago
  If people were focused on their own privileges you’d see concrete examples. The parts of the article talking about green cards is a good example of this. Straight white male (and now add cis, able bodied, etc, etc, etc) used as a talismanic phrase is not focusing on your own privileges. It’s just creating a scapegoat and letting everyone that doesn’t match every last adjective off the hook.
- vanusa 5y ago
  The goal is for everyone to be able to enjoy that. That may be the "goal". Whether public drag-outs as displayed in the OP serve to achieve that is another matter entirely.

Maybe if people focused on their own privileges instead of coming up with an ever-more-adjectived punching bag for all of society’s ills it would go over better.

acdha 5y ago

Isn’t that what we’re seeing? Nobody is saying it’s bad to be a straight white male, only that people like us are playing on easy mode. The goal is for everyone to be able to enjoy that.

AQuantized 5y ago
There are plenty of people in those 'privileged' categories who are not playing on easy mode. A given person fitting that description isn't necessarily represented by the average
- SamoyedFurFluff 5y ago
  It’s okay for privilege to be intersectional. A straight white cis male can still suffer from ableism and classism. But it’s also okay to acknowledge that even in circumstances like being disabled, being perceived as a white cis straight male will have benefits compared to a black trans woman in the same situation, even if that situation sucks for both parties.
  - vanusa 5y ago
    It's also okay to not assume that certain categories of people are sheltered and naive, based solely on their gender status and inferred ancestral composition. And in need of a public calling-out and talking-to, based solely on those observed properties. Which is what started this whole sub-thread, after all.
bradleyjg 5y ago
If people were focused on their own privileges you’d see concrete examples. The parts of the article talking about green cards is a good example of this. Straight white male (and now add cis, able bodied, etc, etc, etc) used as a talismanic phrase is not focusing on your own privileges. It’s just creating a scapegoat and letting everyone that doesn’t match every last adjective off the hook.
vanusa 5y ago
The goal is for everyone to be able to enjoy that. That may be the "goal". Whether public drag-outs as displayed in the OP serve to achieve that is another matter entirely.