28 ms·

> That's why the rules must be simple. That was literally the point I made which you disagreed with!

• Andrew_nenakhov 5y ago
  You seem to be a bit obsessed with points. Ok, I'll elaborate. 1. The original message wasn't missing a point about complex rules harming small players. It was just stating that ANY shit done to IP laws is done on the pretence of helping the small players, but instead benefitting the big ones. This was a typical strawman argument on your part. 2. The point you say I disagreed with in the subsequent message is literally the point I agreed with. Total points score: 2-0 in my favour. Better luck next year, have a nice 2022. ;)
  • laumars 5y ago
    > The original message wasn't missing a point about complex rules harming small players. It was just stating that ANY shit done to IP laws is done on the pretence of helping the small players, but instead benefitting the big ones. This was a typical strawman argument on your part. Again, you’re making the same argument as I was while claiming I wasn’t making it. > The point you say I disagreed with in the subsequent message is literally the point I agreed with. Your comments (this one included) don’t do a particularly good job of expressing what you do and don’t agree with. Half your comments read like a rebuttal despite being an effective reiteration of former comments posted by those you’re replying to. The other half aren’t clear which comments you’re actually replying to (such as this post - it’s so vague as to the sequence of events you’re referring to that your comment is basically meaningless). > You seem to be a bit obsessed with points. > Total points score: 2-0 in my favour. Better luck next year Are you 5 years old? That’s a pathetic way to handle a conversation.