3 ms·

I don't understand, why is this ruled out? Assuming that phones reach a point where this is computationally cheap, what would be so hard about having a sliding

by usui 5y ago

I don't understand, why is this ruled out? Assuming that phones reach a point where this is computationally cheap, what would be so hard about having a sliding window for each frame in the video?

withinboredom 5y ago
The camera moving?
- usui 5y ago
  Then increase the rate at which frames get captured since the video is destined to be ≈24-30 fps anyway?
  - floatboth 5y ago
    But the higher the framerate, the less time you have for exposure on each frame.
alkonaut 5y ago
Nothing prevents that, but if there is a lot of movement (which would be the point of using video) then the great results aren’t as easy to get. You can’t take a still of someone dancing in a dark room with an iPhone, you can take a still of someone standing reasonably still in a dark room.
- usui 5y ago
  Isn't this a similar problem to the blurry-face vs. leaf-face issue discussed? If yes, then one would hand it off to computation to figure out which parts matter and need doctoring, except scaled up to video.